South African court dismisses a major lawsuit by 140,000 Zambian women and children against Anglo American for Kabwe lead poisoning. A setback for affected communities enduring the lasting impact of lead contamination.
Seabed mining, it could be coming to an ocean near you
With the plundering of most of the world’s land-based mineral deposits, the new frontier for the global mining industry is seabed mining. Almost every government with rights over marine areas are currently clambering to enable this destructive practice, still in its experimental phase, to take place in their waters and the scale of what is
With the plundering of most of the world’s land-based mineral deposits, the new frontier for the global mining industry is seabed mining. Almost every government with rights over marine areas are currently clambering to enable this destructive practice, still in its experimental phase, to take place in their waters and the scale of what is proposed in International Waters is alarming.
To the dismay of those powering the momentum behind seabed mining, there is a small group of ocean-loving people who are fighting them every step of the way – and winning. Kiwis Against Seabed Mining (KASM) fought the first two applications for open-cast mining of the seafloor in New Zealand and the developed world. Both were denied by the New Zealand Environmental Protection Authority in 2014. This embarrassed the country’s government, cost mining companies tens of millions of dollars and sent tsunami-sized shock waves through the emerging international seabed mining industry.
Kiwis Against Seabed Mining
KASM is a volunteer-run community organisation that was formed in 2005 after members from the local indigenous Maori community alerted others of seabed mining proposals off the coast of Raglan, on the North Island’s west coast. The town is famous for its world-class surf and as well as its social and environmental activism.
With seabed mining proposals stretching nearly 1000 kilometres of coastline, KASM rallied coastal communities to stand together in an unbroken chain of protection for their marine environment. A Community of Concern was formed. When the first application was made to mine the seabed for iron ore, which would have sucked up 50 million tonnes of the seabed every year for twenty years, record numbers of people stood up and opposed it.
On a shoestring budget KASM cobbled together an excellent legal and scientific team who fought for the oceans and against all odds won the hearing process. A global precedent was set. A bright light was shone on the highly destructive nature of the untested, money-making scheme.
Shortly after, the second application in the developed world was submitted in New Zealand once again, off the east coast of the South Island. The company was targeting phosphate to be used for fertilizer. This time KASM joined Greenpeace and the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, forming another legal and scientific team. The fishing industry and the South Island Maori tribe, Ngai Tahu also fought the application.
Again the New Zealand EPA found that the company couldn’t prove that their proposal wouldn’t cause serious and irreversible damage to the marine environment. The application was denied.
Is seabed mining inherently destructive?
Two applications, two refusals: the global seabed mining industry took a serious blow. These were followed by another denial, this time by Mexican authorities earlier this year for a proposed phosphate mine off the coast of Baja California.
This all leads to a very big question: is seabed mining so inherently destructive that it simply can not take place in this day and age, a time when humanity is recognising that we can no longer “wreck” the environment for profit and that we, collectively, need to be working to repair the damage from our past actions? The answer could well be determined in the next few months, KASM is once again fighting for the safeguard of the west coast of New Zealand’s North Island. The same company that was denied two years ago has re-submitted the same proposal.
The process has just begun and KASM is calling for public submissions and seeking donations to help pay for legal and scientific expertise. If you feel strongly about maintaining healthy oceans for future generations, become an Ocean Lover. Make a submission here, be another brick in the wall and help KASM stop this destructive train from reaching our oceans.
Siamo anche su WhatsApp. Segui il canale ufficiale LifeGate per restare aggiornata, aggiornato sulle ultime notizie e sulle nostre attività.
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
Controversial African land deals by Blue Carbon face skepticism regarding their environmental impact and doubts about the company’s track record, raising concerns about potential divergence from authentic environmental initiatives.
If you were a diver, a surfer, a sailor, or maybe a fisherman, or someone who buys fresh fish at a local market. If you were a person who spends summer days at the beach with your family, or goes for sunset walks along the coastal walkway and enjoys dining al fresco overlooking the sea.
Majuli, the world’s largest river island in Assam State of India is quickly disappearing into the Brahmaputra river due to soil erosion.
Food imported into the EU aren’t subject to the same production standards as European food. The introduction of mirror clauses would ensure reciprocity while also encouraging the agroecological transition.
Sponsored article
Sikkim is a hilly State in north-east India. Surrounded by villages that attracts outsiders thanks to its soothing calmness and natural beauty.
Sikkim, one of the smallest states in India has made it mandatory for new mothers to plant saplings and protect them like their children to save environment
Chilekwa Mumba is a Zambian is an environmental activist and community organizer. He is known for having organized a successful lawsuit against UK-based mining companies.
What led to the Fukushima water release, and what are the impacts of one of the most controversial decisions of the post-nuclear disaster clean-up effort?